MLS 3.0 means a new salary cap, plus problems in Atlanta & more | Mailbag

Sorting out what to expect from the meeting this week that could mean a vastly different salary cap & roster building structure

MLS 3.0 means a new salary cap, plus problems in Atlanta & more | Mailbag
Image via Inter Miami

Big week. The story dominating group chats, front offices, and probably your inbox is the Tuesday report that MLS owners are set to hear a presentation on overhauling the roster rules – salary budget included. This is the kind of news that only comes around once a decade or so, and it deserves real attention, so I'm leading with it (spoiler: transparency matters more than you think).

From there we get into the usual grab bag. Miami's roster-building operation still lapping the field, Atlanta's decade-long identity crisis, why Hugo Cuypers picked Monterrey over MLS, etc etc.

Note that all of these questions are from the Soccerwise Discord, which you can access by joining the Patreon. And note that, as always, I will try to answer every question I get in the comments below (this'll be easier now that the World Cup is over).

Let's get into it.

As I said, the big news of the week came on Tuesday when Tom & Paul reported that MLS owners would be hearing a presentation on potential changes to the league's roster rules and regulations, with a focus on the salary budget.

I'm going to start this by punting directly to Arman Kafai, who writes the excellent Footy Analytic Musings blog, and offered his take on how the rules should change in the hours after the report. Read this:

Simple, yet effective: Changing the MLS Roster Rules
I’ve seen and heard a lot of ideas, but there doesn’t need to be a complete overhaul for big change

In general I sign off on all of it. And from my point of view, as someone who's been obsessed with the league for more than 30 years, and who's been covering it for a living for more than 15, here are the most important issues: